BMS-TPS-KiTeS

Stefan Kuhlmann is emeritus professor of Science, Technology and Society (STS) at the University of Twente (UT) at the Department Technology, Policy, Society (TPS) and the section Science, Technology, and Policy Studies (STəPS). He was Academic Director of WTMC, the Dutch Graduate Research School Science, Technology, and Modern Culture (2018-2021).

Stefan Kuhlmann works on research and technological innovation as social and political processes, focusing on governance and politics, and he publishes widely in the field of research and innovation policy studies (publication profile on Google Scholar).

Before joining the University of Twente Stefan Kuhlmann held leading positions at the Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Germany (1988-2006) and was Professor of Innovation Policy at the Copernicus Institute, University of Utrecht (2001-2006). In the 1980s he was researcher at the University of Kassel, with a focus on the digitalisation of public administration (Forschungsgruppe Verwaltungsautomation, 1979-1988).   

Stefan was an editor of Research Policy (Elsevier) 2005-2020. He is an associate editor of the Int. J. of Foresight and Innovation Policy (IJFIP) and is on the boards of Science and Public Policy, of Asian Research Policy, of the journal Evaluation, of European Journal of Futures Research, of Zeitschrift fĂŒr Evaluation and of Forschung. 

Books include The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy. An International Research Handbook (2010, with R. Smits & P. Shapira); Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation(2016, with R. Lindner et al.); Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies: Towards Better Models (2017, with G. Ordonez); Handbook on Science and Public Policy (2019, with D. Simon, J. Stamm, W. Canzler).

See Stefan's video on the mission of the UT department STəPS.

See Bio and press photos.

See Stefan Kuhlmann’s personal website.

Expertise

  • Computer Science

    • Innovations
  • Social Sciences

    • Governance
    • Science
    • Research
    • Policy
    • Diplomacy
    • Approach
    • Evaluation

Organisations

Stefan Kuhlmann publishes widely in the field of research, technology and innovation policy studies.

Publications

2024
2023
2022
2021
The incandescent light bulb phase-out: Exploring patterns of framing the governance of discontinuing a socio-technical regime, Article 14, 1-22. Stegmaier, P., Visser, V. R. & Kuhlmann, S.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00287-4Enabling Transformation – A Governance Frame for Critical Corporate Actors. Special paper session Transformative capacities for sustainability transitions: harnessing the diversity of conceptualizations in innovation and policy studies. Edler, J., Kuhlmann, S. & Helfrich, F. L.Global resilience through knowledge-based cooperation: a new Protocol for Science Diplomacy, Article 827. Aukes, E., Wilsdon, J., Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. & Kuhlmann, S.https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55199.1Policy lensing of future-oriented strategic intelligence: An experiment connecting foresight with decision making contexts, Article 120803. Robinson, D. K. R., Schoen, A., Laredo, P., Molas Gallart, J., Warnke, P., Kuhlmann, S. & Ordonez Matamoros, G.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120803Reshape science diplomacy for an interconnected world. Aukes, E. J., Kuhlmann, S. & Ordonez Matamoros, G.https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-europe-views-of-europe-2021-7-reshape-science-diplomacy-for-an-interconnected-world/Correction to: The incandescent light bulb phase-out: exploring patterns of framing the governance of discontinuing a socio-technical regime (Energy, Sustainability and Society, (2021), 11, 1, (14), 10.1186/s13705-021-00287-4), Article 21. Stegmaier, P., Visser, V. R. & Kuhlmann, S.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00296-3Creating an interaction space for science diplomacy: meta-governance principles in action. Aukes, E. J., Ordonez Matamoros, G. & Kuhlmann, S.https://www.euspri2021.no/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Session-19.1-updated.pdfGlobal resilience through knowledgebased cooperation: A New Protocol for Science Diplomacy. S4D4C. Aukes, E. J., Wilsdon, J., Ordonez Matamoros, G. & Kuhlmann, S.https://www.s4d4c.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/The-New-Protocol-for-Science-Diplomacy_S4D4C-Policy-Brief-corrected.pdfA New Political Sociology of Science. Netherlands Graduate Research School of Science, Technology and Modern Culture. Kuhlmann, S., Beaulieu, A. & Weber, A.https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2666-2892.2021.01Datafying non-humans. Netherlands Graduate Research School of Science, Technology and Modern Culture. Kuhlmann, S., Beaulieu, A. & Weber, A.https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2666-2892.2021.02Epistemic corruption: Summer school. Netherlands Graduate Research School of Science, Technology and Modern Culture. Kuhlmann, S., Beaulieu, A. & Weber, A.https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2666-2892.2021.03Emerging innovations as systems: Fall workshop. Netherlands Graduate Research School of Science, Technology and Modern Culture. Kuhlmann, S., Beaulieu, A. & Weber, A.https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2666-2892.2021.04
2020

Other contributions

Kuhlmann, S. & Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. (2017), Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies - Towards Better Models, Cheltenham, UK (Edward Elgar)

Lindner, R., Kuhlmann, S., et al. (2016): Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation. Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project. Karlsruhe/D (Fraunhofer ISI)

Smits, R.; Kuhlmann, S. & Shapira, P., The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy - An International Research Handbook, Cheltenham, UK (Edward Elgar), 2010/12 (ebook)

Shapira, Ph., Kuhlmann, S. (eds.) (2003): Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe, Cheltenham (E. Elgar), ISBN 1-84064-875-9 (e-book) (Chinese translation)

Research profiles

Courses academic year 2023/2024

Courses in the current academic year are added at the moment they are finalised in the Osiris system. Therefore it is possible that the list is not yet complete for the whole academic year.

Courses academic year 2022/2023

For more than 40 years Stefan Kuhlmann has been involved in studies of research and technological innovation as social and political processes – with changing entrance points and perspectives.  Since the late 1980s he has analysed science, research and innovation systems and public policies, focusing on the dynamics of governance. He has led or has been involved in numerous international collaborative research projects and networks.

Recent research projects are listed below (selection).

Current projects

The New Role of the State for Diffusion and Emergence of Innovation

Herrenhausen Conference, Hanover/Germany, February 20-22, 2019

The role of the state and of state governments in knowledge societies for the stimulation, regulation and diffusion of innovation has been debated in politics and various social sciences for years, especially in times of economic crisis. Current discussions include the question whether and how state-related actors and agencies can mobilize innovations and drive their diffusion to properly address Grand Societal Challenges and Sustainable Development Goals worldwide: climate and environmental threats, natural resource scarcities, increasing levels of inequality and exclusion and the challenges of the digitalization and robotization of our lives, to name a few. We, Uwe Cantner (Friedrich Schiller University, Jena), Dirk Fornahl (University of Bremen) and Stefan Kuhlmann (University of Twente) have asked researchers worldwide to join the Herrenhausen Conference and present their perspectives to the debate. Questions of the conference include: Has state-driven innovation (policy) positive impacts on welfare and growth? What is the role of the state and "statehood" for innovation vis-Ă -vis economic and social actors? How can governments and innovation policy address societal transitions and grand societal changes? How to overcome innovation system lock-in? Is there a role for "creative corporatism" beyond incumbent stakeholders and new tech giants? How can innovation policy be made more inclusive and help to bridge social divides? How to address persistent global inequality? Innovation policy for economic and extra-economic Returns: How to master the balance?

Finished projects

“Using science for/in diplomacy for addressing global challenges (S4D4C)”

EU Horizon 2020 funded project, grant n° 770342, Jan 2018 – Dec 2020

S4D4C aims to support current and future European science diplomacy for the benefit of European capacities, EU foreign policy goals and especially the development of solutions for global challenges. This includes the EU’s commitment to the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which have an important science, technology and innovation component. Project partners: Centre for Social Innovation GmbH (coordinator); International Bureau of the BMBF at DLR, Germany; Charles University Prague, Czech Republic; German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies; UNESCO/TWAS, France/Italy; University of Sheffield, UK; Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology, Spain; University Lille II, France; Vienna School of International Studies, Austria.

Res-AGorA

Responsible Research and Innovation in a Distributed Anticipatory Governance Frame. A Constructive Socio-normative Approach

The EU FP7 funded project (2012-16) contained three core empirical elements: ‱ A series of case studies examining in depth existing responsibility governance across technological domains ‱ A systematic country monitoring disseminated through a web portal ‱ A number of co-constructive workshops bringing together key stakeholders Through this co-constructive approach the Res-AGorA project has built a robust framework acknowledging different values and world views while actively supporting the participation of stakeholders and the general public in constructive engagement in problem solving at macro and micro levels: the Res-AGorA “Responsibility Navigator”. Res-AGorA had of 8 European partners from universities and offices for science and technology: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (D); Universiteit Twente (NL); Universita degli studi di Padova (I); Danish Board of Technology Foundation (DK); Institut fĂŒr höhere Studien und wissenschaftliche Forschung (A); University of Manchester (UK); UniversitĂ© de Marne La Vallee (F); Aarhus University (DK).

Governance of Discontinuation of Sociotechnical Systems

DiscGo, funded by NWO-ORA (2012-15)

This project aimed at a better understanding of the governance of the abandonment of socio-technical systems. It asked what discontinuation means as a problem of action for policy-makers. So far, the governance of socio-technical systems has preferentially been associated with advancement and innovation. Discontinuation of socio-technical systems is, at most, discussed as regime change, innovation setback or failure—as if advancement and innovation was the only direction in which socio-technical development and governance would go. The DiscGo research consortium consisted of research groups at the University of Sussex, Brighton (United Kingdom), the TU Dortmund University (Germany), the UnitĂ© Science en SociĂ©tĂ© (SenS) at the Institut Francilien Recherche Innovation SociĂ©tĂ©, IFRIS, Paris (France) and the University of Twente, Enschede (The Netherlands). The UT based group is coordinating the consortium.

Research and Innovation Futures 2030: From explorative to transformative scenarios

RIF 2030, EU FP7 (2011-13)

The RIF project aimed to a) systematize knowledge on emerging patterns, trends and drivers of change in ways of doing and organising research in our knowledge societies, b) provide an outlook on future pathways for STI systems and practices by way of scenarios, c) assess and identify key issues of the scenarios against the background of the emerging European Research Area, and) to establish a dialogue on future perspectives for STI in order to identify strategic options and opportunities for action. RIF focused on the dynamics of change resulting from the interplay of developments inside and outside of STI systems. It is based on the assumption that current trends will give rise to certain tensions and dilemmas which may be resolved within the constraints of current institutional settings, or else through substantial transformation of STI systems and practices. The project started with a comprehensive stocktaking of European and international forward-looking activities, and an analysis of academic literature on emerging new modes of doing and organising research. This served as the basis for a two-stage interactive scenario process. At first explorative scenarios with a time horizon of 2020 were developed based on exploration of current trends and drivers within the constraints of today’s STI framework. These scenarios pointed towards key critical junctures in ways of doing and organising research. The second phase generated long-term transformative scenarios towards 2030 that may incorporate significant structural and institutional changes in STI systems and practices. In a series of tailored interactive workshops the scenarios’ implications for key policy objectives were assessed and strategic options for different actors and stakeholders explored. RIF relied on extensive stakeholder interaction, using both face-to-face formats and Web 2.0 tools. A range of dissemination activities ensured a widespread debate of RIF findings by stakeholders. RIF 2030 partners were: AIT Austrian Institute of Technology; University of Twente; Manchester University; VTT Finland

Visions for the European Research Area

VERA, EU FP7 (2012-15)

The VERA project aimed to provide relevant strategic intelligence for the future governance and priority-setting of the research, technology, development and innovation (RTDI) system in Europe and for better adapting science, technology and innovation policy to the shifting global environment and upcoming socio-economic challenges. For this purpose VERA carried out an in-depth stocktaking of RTDI related forward looking activities in Europe and internationally and a thorough review of trends and drivers of long-term change of European RTDI governance. On the base of these insights VERA developed scenarios on the evolution of the European Research Area, assesses the critical issues for the ERA’s future capabilities emerging from these scenarios, explores subsequent strategic options and ultimately generates a set of policy recommendations for responsive and future oriented multi-level, multi-domain RTDI policy strategies. VERA was conceptualised as a continuously progressing two-way communication process among ERA actor groups from society, industry, academia and policy across domains, levels and regions. It has set up a strategic conversation between these stakeholders that evolves through several carefully tailored stages in order to jointly discover shared visions and strategic options around the ERA’s future perspectives towards 2020 and far beyond. VERA explored the gradual evolution following from current patterns of change but also explicitly embraced transformative and disruptive developments with a long term perspective. VERA partners were: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Germany (Coordinator); Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (UEFISCDI), Romania; University of Twente; IFRIS - Institute on Research, Innovation and Society, France; Austrian Institute of Technology (AIT), Austria; University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, UK; VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland; INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) - Institute of Innovation and Knowledge Management, Spain; EC Joint Research Centre - Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (JRC-IPTS); Centre for Social Innovation (ZSI), Austria.

Address

University of Twente

Ravelijn (building no. 10), room 4410
Hallenweg 17
7522 NH Enschede
Netherlands

Navigate to location

Organisations

Scan the QR code or
Download vCard